| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
I am sitting at a demographic encounter. The speaker right now is telling us of the demise and prosperity of the churches within
Major question: can today’s church not function without a building? Is a church not a church unless it has a building? Does it not seem strange that we have celebrated rebuilt buildings more than rebuilt lives? Why is our stansdard of measurement how many people we can cram into the building rather than it being how many missionaries (Christ followers) we are sending out?
It could be argued that many of these churches were incapacitated even before Katrina came. When you see the lack of community impact, the growing rate of unchurched along the gulfcoast and in
Finally, the speaker is getting to the heart of success as he shows the meeting place of congregations that, because of the mission opportunities provided by Katrina, were able to continue with a strong community presence. Katrina opened ministry opportunities that they used as open doors to make disciples among those in the community. The post-Katrina congregation is stronger because the church functioned. It functioned through the storm, after the storm, and now even without a building. The rebuilt walls only serve to make the gathering of the church more convenient. But, a healthy congregation will function without regard to where. As one pastor very ably replied when asked where his church was, “What time is it now?”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
28. July 2008 at 20:35
I read an incredible book called “Pagan Christianity” by Frank Viola and I think we can find many answers to that questions David is throwing out.
Is just a matter of returning to the ancient paths, aka biblical ways, and forget about the implants we have made to our ecclesiology.